Benchmark
Who AI Recommends for AI-Visibility Tools
We ran our own measurement methodology against the market GeoHero competes in, before selling that methodology to anyone. This is the public result: who ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity actually cite when someone asks for an AI-visibility or GEO tool.
Twenty buying-intent prompts, in three languages, across four chat engines, one run each, 240 scored answers total. Every player below is counted by how many of those answers cited it.
There is no GeoHero row on this board. This snapshot was captured before GeoHero existed as a citable product. A fair self-score needs its own dated run against an established category, not a placeholder zero next to competitors that have been measured for years.
Read this leaderboard honestly
A single-run snapshot, not an average
This is a single-run snapshot, not an averaged score with a confidence interval. Ask the same 20 prompts again tomorrow and some numbers will move, because LLM outputs are not fully deterministic. That is real data, not a guarantee, and a repeated, interval-backed version of this exact board is what a paid scan produces.
Within-tool only, never across engines or runs
Every number here is a share of these same 240 answers, never an absolute score compared against a different engine or a different research run. Comparing one engine to another, or this run to some other survey, is not a valid reading of this board.
This board runs the exact protocol described on our methodology page: declared prompts, declared engines, a declared run count, every time.
Read the full methodologySee where your own brand stands, measured the same way.
One-time report, no subscription, delivered in days.